Proceedings
Authors
| Filter results3 paper(s) found. |
|---|
1. Where to Put Treatments for On-farm ExperimentationOn-farm experimentation has become more and more popular due to advancements in technology. These experiments are not as costly as before, as current machinery can allocate different levels of treatment to specific plots. The main goal of this kind of experiment is to obtain a site-specific nutrient level. The yield behavior is different based on the researcher’s treatment. One unanswered question for on-farm experimentation is how the treatments should be allocated in the first place such... D. Poursina, W. Brorsen |
2. Using Informative Bayesian Priors and On-farm Experimentation to Predict Optimal Site-specific Nitrogen RatesMost U.S. Corn Belt states now recommend the Maximum Return to Nitrogen (MRTN) method for determining optimal nitrogen rates, which is based on 15 years of on-farm yield response to nitrogen trials. The MRTN method recommends a uniform rate for a region of a state. This study combines Illinois MRTN data, Bayesian methods, and on-farm experimentation from the Data Intensive Farm Management (DIFM) project to provide site-specific nitrogen recommendations. On-farm trials are now being used to provide... W. Brorsen, D. Poursina, C. Patterson, T. Mieno, B. Edge, E.D. Nafziger |
3. A Commercially Feasible Approach to Estimating Spatially Varying Plateau Functions with On-Farm Experiment DataAs technology in precision agriculture continues to advance, unprecedented volumes of high-resolution agronomic data are now available across years, farms, and regions. The availability of this data creates opportunities to improve both the economic and environmental performance of crop production through variable-rate nitrogen (VRN) recommendations tailored to site-specific yield response. However, widespread adoption of VRN remains elusive, in part because existing algorithms are either too... W.H. Duncan, W. Brorsen |