Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Uberuaga, D.P
Varner, D.L
Jezek, J
Eivazi, F
Add filter to result:
Authors
Varner, D.L
Eivazi, F
Charvat, K
Jezek, J
Musil, M
Krivanek, Z
Gnip, P
Kemanian, A.R
Huggins, D.R
Uberuaga, D.P
Topics
Precision A-Z for Practitioners
Precision Conservation
Sensor Application in Managing In-season Crop Variability
Precision Carbon Management
Type
Poster
Oral
Year
2010
Home » Authors » Results

Authors

Filter results4 paper(s) found.

1. Networking Advances Emerging Agricultural Technologies

  Innovative Nebraska farmers and agribusinesses partnered with University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) extension in 2001 to form the Nebraska Agricultural Technologies Association (NeATA). UNL Extension faculty and NeATA members have collaborated for nearly a decade to further agriculturists' understanding and adoption of emerging agricultural technologies via machinery/technology field days, hands-on GIS/GPS computer workshops, aerial imagery experiential learning,... D.L. Varner

2. Minimizing On-farm Point Source Contamination Of Pesticides Using The “Biobed” Method

  Microorganisms play a vital role in maintaining the environmental quality through their metabolic activities. The highly versatile metabolic capabilities of fungi and bacteria can be used to reclaim polluted ecosystems. A variety of biological, chemical, and physical methods have been used for degradation and detoxification of pesticides. However, conventional clean- up methods are costly and not always effective. Agrochemical storage and handling practices have been targeted... F. Eivazi

3. Vlite Node – New Sensor Technology For Precision Farming

... K. Charvat, J. Jezek, M. Musil, Z. Krivanek, P. Gnip

4. Modeling Soil Carbon Spatial Variation: Case Study In The Palouse Region

Soil organic carbon (Cs) levels in the soil profile reflect the transient state or equilibrium conditions determined by organic carbon inputs and outputs. In areas with strong topography, erosion, transport and deposition control de soil carbon balance and determine strong within-field differences in soil carbon. Carbon gains or losses are therefore difficult to predict for the average field. Total Cs ranged from 54 to 272 Mg C ha-1, with 42% (range 25 to 78%) of Cs in the top 0.3-m of the soil... A.R. Kemanian, D.R. Huggins, D.P. Uberuaga