Login

Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Brorsen, W
Port, K
Bekkerman, A
Add filter to result:
Authors
Colley III, R
Fulton, J
Douridas, N
Port, K
Maxwell, B.D
Bekkerman, A
Silverman, N
Payn, R
Sheppard, J
Izurieta, C
Davis, P
Hegedus, P.B
Lee, J
Fulton, J
Port, K
Colley III, R
Fulton, J.P
Hawkins, E
Colley III, R
Port, K
Shearer, S
Klopfenstein, A
Maxwell, B.D
Hegedus, P.D
Loewen, S.D
Duff, H.D
Sheppard, J.W
Peerlinck, A.D
Morales, G.L
Bekkerman, A
Poursina, D
Brorsen, W
Brorsen, W
Poursina, D
Patterson, C
Mieno, T
Edge, B
Nafziger, E.D
Topics
Big Data, Data Mining and Deep Learning
On Farm Experimentation with Site-Specific Technologies
Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems
On Farm Experimentation with Site-Specific Technologies
On Farm Experimentation with Site-Specific Technologies
Type
Oral
Year
2018
2022
2024
Home » Authors » Results

Authors

Filter results7 paper(s) found.

1. On-Farm Digital Solutions and Their Associated Value to North American Farmers

Digital tools and data collection have become standard in a wide variety of present day agricultural operations. An array of digital tools, such as high resolution operational mapping, remote sensing, and farm management software offer solutions to many of the problems in modern agriculture. These technologies and services can, if implemented correctly, provide both immediate and long term agronomic value. A growing number of producers in Ohio and around North America question the proper method... R. Colley iii, J. Fulton, N. Douridas, K. Port

2. Can Optimization Associated with On-Farm Experimentation Using Site-Specific Technologies Improve Producer Management Decisions?

Crop production input decisions have become increasingly difficult due to uncertainty in global markets, input costs, commodity prices, and price premiums. We hypothesize that if producers had better knowledge of market prices, spatial variability in crop response, and weather conditions that drive crop response to inputs, they could more cost-effectively make profit-maximizing input decisions. Understanding the drivers of variability in crop response and designing accompanying management strategies... B.D. Maxwell, A. Bekkerman, N. Silverman, R. Payn, J. Sheppard, C. Izurieta, P. Davis, P.B. Hegedus

3. Overview and Value of Digital Technologies for North American Soybean Producers

In the current state of digital agriculture, many digital technologies and services are offered to assist North American soybean producers.  Opportunities for capturing and analyzing information related to soybean production methods are made available through the adoption of these technologies.  However, often it is difficult for producers to know which digital tools and services are available to them or understand the value they can provide.  The objective of this... J. Lee, J. Fulton, K. Port, R. Colley iii

4. eFields – An On-Farm Research Network to Inform Farm Recommendations

On-farm research has been traditionally used to provide local, field-scale information about agronomic practices. Farmers tend to have more confidence in on-farm research results because they are perceived to be more relevant to their farm operations compared to small plot research results. In recent years, more farmers have been conducting on-farm studies to help evaluate practices and input decisions.  Recent advances in precision agriculture technologies have stream-lined the on-farm... J.P. Fulton, E. Hawkins, R. Colley iii, K. Port, S. Shearer, A. Klopfenstein

5. Decision Support from On-field Precision Experiments

Empirically driven adaptive management in large-scale commodity crop production has become possible with spatially controlled application and sub-field scale crop monitoring technology. Site-specific experimentation is fundamental to an agroecosystem adaptive management (AAM) framework that results in information for growers to make informed decisions about their practices. Crop production and quality response data from combine harvester mounted sensors and internet available remote sensing data... B.D. Maxwell, P.D. Hegedus, S.D. Loewen, H.D. Duff, J.W. Sheppard, A.D. Peerlinck, G.L. Morales, A. Bekkerman

6. Where to Put Treatments for On-farm Experimentation

On-farm experimentation has become more and more popular due to advancements in technology. These experiments are not as costly as before, as current machinery can allocate different levels of treatment to specific plots. The main goal of this kind of experiment is to obtain a site-specific nutrient level. The yield behavior is different based on the researcher’s treatment. One unanswered question for on-farm experimentation is how the treatments should be allocated in the first place such... D. Poursina, W. Brorsen

7. Using Informative Bayesian Priors and On-farm Experimentation to Predict Optimal Site-specific Nitrogen Rates

Most U.S. Corn Belt states now recommend the Maximum Return to Nitrogen (MRTN) method for determining optimal nitrogen rates, which is based on 15 years of on-farm yield response to nitrogen trials. The MRTN method recommends a uniform rate for a region of a state. This study combines Illinois MRTN data, Bayesian methods, and on-farm experimentation from the Data Intensive Farm Management (DIFM) project to provide site-specific nitrogen recommendations. On-farm trials are now being used to provide... W. Brorsen, D. Poursina, C. Patterson, T. Mieno, B. Edge, E.D. Nafziger