Login
Toggle navigation
Home
ICPA
Conference
Abstract Management
Abstract Topic Groups
Author Instructions
Registration
Registration Information
16th ICPA - Conference Registration
Registrants Map
Hotel and Travel Information
Tour
Workshops
Exhibit Hall Map
Sponsors
Conference Program
General Outline
Oral Program
Poster Program
Student Poster Awards
Keynote
Plenary Session
Awards
Photos
Conference Survey
Proceedings
Leadership
ISPA Leadership
Officers
Past Presidents
Officer Responsibilities
Country Representatives
Communities
Community Guidance
On-Farm Experimentation
Nitrogen
Latin America
Economics
African Association for Precision Agriculture
Membership
ISPA Member Benefits
Membership Form
Events
ISPA Events
ACPA
ACPA Proceedings
AfCPA
AfCPA Proceedings
CLAP
CLAP Proceedings
ECPA
ECPA Proceedings
ICPA
ISPA Webinars
OFE
AAPA
Latin American
Robotics and Automation Symposium
Event Overview
Registration
Program
Venue
Speakers
About ISPA
Newsletters
History
Jobs
Precision Ag Definition
Agriculture Course Database Submission
Publications
ICPA Proceedings
ECPA Proceedings
Contact Us
Members
Suggestion Form
Conference
Abstract Management
Abstract Topic Groups
Author Instructions
Registration
Registration Information
16th ICPA - Conference Registration
Registrants Map
Hotel and Travel Information
Tour
Workshops
Exhibit Hall Map
Sponsors
Conference Program
General Outline
Oral Program
Poster Program
Student Poster Awards
Keynote
Plenary Session
Awards
Photos
Conference Survey
Proceedings
Proceedings
Search
Authors
Topics
Years
Types
Find matching any:
Reset
» Add more topics
Add filter to result:
Conditioning Factors For Decision-Making Regarding Precision Agriculture Techniques Usage
1
H. L. Burnquist,
2
C. C. Costa
1. ESALQ/USP
2. Embrapa
The eventual goal of using the techniques of precision agriculture (described as inputs applied at varied rates) is to get one of the following results: (a) lowering cost by reducing inputs, (b) decreasing the pollution of water, soil and the atmosphere and (c) increasing agricultural productivity by the more efficient use of inputs. However, studies on these techniques do not reach similar conclusions. This could be expected, since the effectiveness of these techniques would depend on the environment in which they were employed. Thus, this study was carried out in order to list and analyze the main factors defining whether or not an area will enable success in the use of precision agriculture. The criteria for success only took the results regarding the reduction in the use of inputs and increased productivity into account. There were two reasons for this: first, it is just these effects that generate increased income for farmers, and second, environmental gains will always follow.
The method used for this analysis was to estimate the revenue and the cost of production arising from the use of an agricultural production function, considering the various conditions that we find in the field if fertilizers are applied at fixed (no precision agriculture) and varied rates. The conditions analyzed were: number of sub-areas with different degrees of fertility for farming, degree of variation in the fertility of the whole area, the size of each area and which sub-areas were sampled for uniform application of inputs. From these conditions, we analyzed the various scenarios that could be observed in the field, comparing uniform and varied application. The results were analyzed to reveal the changes in the amount of inputs used, the agricultural productivity and the profitability for the producer.
The results showed that the factor that most influenced the gain in producer profitability, when adopting the use of precision agriculture tools (fertilizer applied at varied rates) instead of the uniform application of fertilizer was the shape of the area sampled for uniform application. Corroborating other studies, the results also indicated that the use of precision agriculture, with varied application of fertilizers, is economically more advantageous if applied over large areas. However, in contrast to other studies, we cannot say that varied application of fertilizer definitely reduces input or increases crop productivity. One or both of these gains could occur, depending on the condition of the area and samples taken for uniform application of fertilizer. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no point in conducting scientific studies that analyze the general economic impact of applying the techniques of precision agriculture, since this impact must be analyzed individually for each area.
Keyword
: wide application; inputs; productivity
H. L. Burnquist
C. C. Costa
Profitability, Sustainability and Adoption
Oral
2014
Download paper