Login

Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Add filter to result:
Corn Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendation Models Based on Soil Hydrologic Groups Aid in Predicting Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rates
1G. M. Bean, 1N. R. Kitchen, 2J. J. Camberato, 3R. B. Ferguson, 4F. G. Fernandez, 5D. W. Franzen, 6C. A. Laboski, 7E. D. Nafziger, 8J. E. Sawyer, 9P. C. Scharf
1. Univ. of Missouri-USDA ARS-Columbia MO
2. Purdue Univ.-Lafayette IN
3. Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln NE
4. Univ. of Minnesota-St. Paul MN
5. North Dakota State Univ.-Fargo ND
6. Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison WI
7. Univ. of Illinois-Urbana IL
8. Iowa State Univ.-Ames IA
9. Univ. of Missouri-Columbia MO

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer recommendations that match corn (Zea mays L.) N needs maximize grower profits and minimize water quality consequences. However, spatial and temporal variability makes determining future N requirements difficult. Studies have shown no single soil or weather measurement is consistently increases accuracy, especially when applied over a regional scale, in predicting economically optimal N rate (EONR). Basing site N response on soil hydrological group could help account for soil and weather variability and better match in-season corn N fertilization need. Research was conducted across eight Midwestern states totaling 49 different site locations. Sites were delineated into five groups based on USDA-NRCS hydrologic designation and drainage class. Each group was regressed against measured soil and weather variables. Measured soil variables were analyzed by 0 to 0.30 and 0 to 0.60 m depths and included clay content, organic matter, plant available water, and total organic carbon. Measured weather variables, from the time of planting to the time of in-season canopy sensing, included site growing degree days, total precipitation, evenness of rainfall (using the Shannon Diversity Index), and the abundant and well-distributed rainfall. The resulting most significant soil and weather variables for improving EONR estimation were selected to develop an N fertilizer recommendation model for each of the five groups. Model R2 values ranged from 0.48 to 0.85 while root-mean-square errors ranged from 16 to 43 kg N ha-1. When compared to EONR, and considering all five models, 79% of the sites fell within 34 kg N ha-1 of EONR with an R2 of 0.72 and a root-mean-square-error of 34.5 kg N ha-1. Overall, these results suggest that soil hydrological groups can assist in determining which soil and weather interaction will most affect site-specific EONR.

Keyword: Corn, Nitrogen, Model, In-season, Soil Hydrology, EONR