Login
Toggle navigation
Home
ICPA
Conference
Abstract Management
Abstract Topic Groups
Author Instructions
Registration
Registration Information
16th ICPA - Conference Registration
Registrants Map
Hotel and Travel Information
Tour
Workshops
Exhibit Hall Map
Sponsors
Conference Program
General Outline
Oral Program
Poster Program
Student Poster Awards
Keynote
Plenary Session
Awards
Photos
Conference Survey
Proceedings
Leadership
ISPA Leadership
Officers
Past Presidents
Officer Responsibilities
Country Representatives
Communities
Community Guidance
On-Farm Experimentation
Nitrogen
Latin America
Economics
African Association for Precision Agriculture
Membership
ISPA Member Benefits
Membership Form
Events
ISPA Events
ACPA
ACPA Proceedings
AfCPA
AfCPA Proceedings
CLAP
CLAP Proceedings
ECPA
ECPA Proceedings
ICPA
ISPA Webinars
OFE
AAPA
Latin American
Robotics and Automation Symposium
Event Overview
Registration
Program
Venue
Speakers
About ISPA
Newsletters
History
Jobs
Precision Ag Definition
Agriculture Course Database Submission
Publications
ICPA Proceedings
ECPA Proceedings
Contact Us
Members
Suggestion Form
Conference
Abstract Management
Abstract Topic Groups
Author Instructions
Registration
Registration Information
16th ICPA - Conference Registration
Registrants Map
Hotel and Travel Information
Tour
Workshops
Exhibit Hall Map
Sponsors
Conference Program
General Outline
Oral Program
Poster Program
Student Poster Awards
Keynote
Plenary Session
Awards
Photos
Conference Survey
Proceedings
Proceedings
Search
Authors
Topics
Years
Types
Find matching any:
Reset
» Add more topics
Add filter to result:
Row-Crop Planter Requirements To Support Variable-Rate Seeding Of Maize
1
J. P. Fulton,
2
K. S. Balkcom,
3
B. V. Ortiz,
1
T. P. McDonald,
4
G. L. Pate,
1
S. S. Virk,
5
A. Poncet
1. Biosystems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
2. National Soil Dynamics Lab, Auburn, AL 36849
3. Agronomy & Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
4. EV Smith Research Center, Shorter, AL 36075
5. Auburn University
Current planting technology possesses the ability to increase crop productivity and improve field efficiency by precisely metering and placing crop seeds. Growing high yielding crops not only requires using the right seed variety and rate but also achieving optimal performance with available planter technology. Planter performance depends on using the correct planter and technology (display and rate controller system) setup which consists of determining optimal settings for different planting variables such as seed depth, down pressure, and seed metering unit. An investigation was conducted to evaluate the performance of current planting technology for accurate placement of seeds. Two studies consisting of 2 different setups on a 6-row, John Deere planter for seeding of maize (
Zea mays L.
) were conducted. The first study aimed at assessing planter performance at 2 depth settings (2.5 & 5.0 cm) and 4 different down pressure settings (varying from none to high) with planter setup to perform a uniform seeding rate (65185 seeds/ha) and constant ground speed (7.0 km/hr). The second study focused on evaluating planter performance during variable-rate seeding with treatments consisting of 2 seed metering units (John Deere Standard and Precision Planting’s eSet setups) with 5 different seeding rates (49383, 59259, 69136, 79012 & 88889 seeds/ha) and 4 ground speed treatments (6.0, 7.0, 8.2 & 9.4 km/hr). All treatments were randomized and replicated four times. A data acquisition system was developed for monitoring and logging real-time planting variables such as meter speed and row unit acceleration/vibration with this data tagged using a differential global positioning system (DGPS) receiver in order to create spatial maps. Field data collection for the down pressure study consisted of measuring plant emergence, plant population and seed depth whereas seed spacing, plant population after emergence along with distance and location for rate changes within the field were recorded for the variable-rate seeding study. As-planted data consisting of plant population, seed spacing and meter performance was also recorded using 2 commercially available displays for both studies and analyzed for comparing planter performance based on the actual field data. Crop yield was also measured to evaluate the effect of the different treatments on planter performance. Preliminary results indicated that down pressure impacted crop emergence. Measured seed depth was significantly different from the target depth even though time was spent adjusting the units to achieve the desired. For example, the mean for the 5-cm treatment was 3.8-cm in one field and 4.1-cm for another field. Seed depth results indicated variability at times based on field soil conditions which would explain the differences between the target and measured depths. Results from the variable-rate study indicated that seeding rate changes were accomplished within or less than a 1.9-m distance or a quick response time (< 1 sec) regardless of ground speed. This quick response over varying ground speed treatments indicates that current hydraulic drives minimize rate change errors. Row-unit acceleration or ride varied between individual units with one row-unit exhibiting lower ride quality compared to other units and the main toolbar. Planter field performance significantly varied for the two types of metering units. Seed metering unit setup and meter speed (dependent on ground speed and seeding rate) is critical to obtain expected performance of today’s planting technology. The results showed that planter performance is dependent on meter speed, and field performance starts degrading at higher meter speeds (> 38 rpm) for both meter setups. Overall, the eSet meter performed better than Standard John Deere meter setup exhibiting more uniform seed spacing and higher crop yields. The study recommended that operators need to ensure the correct planter and display setups in order to achieve needed seed placement performance to support variable-rate seeding.
Keyword
: Variable rate, Field Performance, Setup, Seed Metering, Down Pressure, Seed Depth
J. P. Fulton
K. S. Balkcom
B. V. Ortiz
T. P. Mcdonald
G. L. Pate
S. S. Virk
A. Poncet
Engineering Technologies and Advances
Oral
2014
Download paper